The Supreme Court warned Amrapali group for its hood-winking and continuous non-compliance attitude towards the Court’s order. Recently, the Supreme Court said, “Writing is very clear on the wall,” and directed this real estate firm to give in the details of all its properties that are owned in the name of directors, their family members, relatives, chief financial officers and statutory auditors in India and abroad. The Supreme Court of India gave one last opportunity to the Amrapali Group along with its directors and promoters to comply with each and every direction passed by the court since May last year.
A bench of two Justices, Arun Mishra and UU Lalit also said that Amrapali Group will have to disclose each and every detail and activity including financial transactions by which home-buyers’ money was transferred. The bench of judges stated, “We make it very clear that Amrapali Group should disclose each and every activity in clear terms it took since 2008 onwards related to the construction of residential, commercial, personal, official and financial where the money was transferred. If all the disclosures are not made by Amrapali Group and its directors then the writing is very clear on the wall.” The court also asked to embed the details of all the land which has been sub-leased, structures raised on it and the financial benefits to the company.
It directed the banks, Noida and Greater Noida authorities and other bodies concerned to cooperate with the forensic auditors, saying that they have been acting on the direction of the court and any non-compliance will be treated as contempt of the court. It directed the registry of the court to accept `1 crore demand draft given by Amrapali’s CFO Chander Wadhwa and asked the group to depute four persons for assisting the forensic auditors in their investigation of company’s affair.
The next date of hearing is 5th December and the Amrapali group is directed to submit its reply on 3rd December. On November 13, in a massive crackdown on Amrapali Group for “willful disobedience” of its orders, the apex court had attached the company’s 100-bed multi-Speciality hospital, bank accounts, the building which houses its office, certain firms and a “benami” Villa in Goa.
Earlier, the Court directed Company’s CFO of deposit `11.69 crore with its registry within three weeks. It also asked a statutory auditor Anil Mittal to pay `47 lakh. It restrained the realty firm from alienating its companies through which it had transactions and ordered attachment of such firms.
The Amrapali group is also restricted from creating any third party rights for 86 luxury cars and SUVs purchased from the company’s funds. It had sought the presence of CMD Anil Sharma and two directors Shiv Priya and Ajay Kumar on November 19 and said that Amrapali Group had deliberately not complied with its earlier order and committed a “serious fraud” by diverting home-buyers’ money from one company to other.
It has ordered the attachment of the group’s state-of-the-art, multi-Speciality, 100-bed hospital situated at Greater Noida for which funds from sister company Ultra Home Construction were utilized. The court has also attached the bank accounts of GauriSuta Infrastructures, its director Sunil Kumar and its assets after forensic auditors disclosed that Amrapali transferred home-buyers’ money from one company to sister companies using it as conduit.
The Court also ordered attachment of towers which housed the company’s office and ‘Aqua Fortis’ villa in Goa for no one came forward to claim ownership. On October 31, the apex court had directed the Amrapali Group to disclose the names of all the companies with which it had any kind of transactions after forensic auditors pointed out that there may be a web of more than 200-250 such companies where home-buyers’ money was transferred.
The two forensic auditors, appointed by the court to look into the affairs of Amrapali Group had said besides 47 sister companies, they stumbled upon 31 companies whose names were never disclosed by the embattled real estate firm. It had also initiated contempt proceedings against Sharma and its directors for prima facie violating court’s order and thwarting the course of justice.